| | | | | | |

Core i5-2410M vs Pentium N3530


Description
The i5-2410M is based on Sandy Bridge architecture while the N3530 is based on Silvermont.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-2410M gets a score of 36.9 k points while the N3530 gets 34.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-2410M is 1.1 times faster than the N3530. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
206a7
30678
Core
Sandy Bridge
Bay Trail-M
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.167 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.9 GHz
2.58 GHz
Socket
Socket G2 (988B)
BGA 1170
Cores/Threads
2/2
4/4
TDP
35 W
7,5 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x24 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x1024 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
kB
Date
February 2011
February 2014
Mean monothread perf.
20.1k points
10.44k points
Mean multithread perf.
38.68k points
34.57k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-2410M
N3530
Test#1 (Integers)
7.98k
4.86k (x0.61)
Test#2 (FP)
6.55k
2.5k (x0.38)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.28k
1.82k (x0.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.7k
1.26k (x0.47)
TOTAL
20.52k
10.44k (x0.51)

Multithread

i5-2410M

N3530
Test#1 (Integers)
13.66k
17.22k (x1.26)
Test#2 (FP)
13.17k
8.89k (x0.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.05k
6.89k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.02k
1.57k (x0.52)
TOTAL
36.9k
34.57k (x0.94)

Performance/W
i5-2410M
N3530
Test#1 (Integers)
390 points/W
2460 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
376 points/W
1269 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
202 points/W
984 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
86 points/W
225 points/W
TOTAL
1054 points/W
4938 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-2410M
N3530
Test#1 (Integers)
2752 points/GHz
1884 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2258 points/GHz
967 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1132 points/GHz
707 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
933 points/GHz
488 points/GHz
TOTAL
7075 points/GHz
4047 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4