| | | | | | |

Core i5-10600K vs i3-13100F


Description
The i5-10600K is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i3-13100F is based on Raptor Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10600K gets a score of 365.7 k points while the i3-13100F gets 390.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-13100F is 1.1 times faster than the i5-10600K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0655
b06f5
Core
Comet Lake-S
Raptor Lake-S
Architecture
Comet Lake
Base frecuency
4.1 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
125 W
58 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
12288 kB
Date
April 2020
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
74.09k points
100.94k points
Mean multithread perf.
365.67k points
390.23k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10600K
i3-13100F
Test#1 (Integers)
30.27k
47.14k (x1.56)
Test#2 (FP)
26.42k
25.77k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.07k
13.25k (x2.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.33k
14.77k (x1.3)
TOTAL
74.09k
100.94k (x1.36)

Multithread

i5-10600K

i3-13100F
Test#1 (Integers)
164.69k
168.51k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
156.45k
142.8k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
37.39k
63.57k (x1.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.15k
15.34k (x2.15)
TOTAL
365.67k
390.23k (x1.07)

Performance/W
i5-10600K
i3-13100F
Test#1 (Integers)
1317 points/W
2905 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1252 points/W
2462 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
299 points/W
1096 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
57 points/W
264 points/W
TOTAL
2925 points/W
6728 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-10600K
i3-13100F
Test#1 (Integers)
6306 points/GHz
10476 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5505 points/GHz
5728 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1264 points/GHz
2945 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2361 points/GHz
3283 points/GHz
TOTAL
15436 points/GHz
22432 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4