| | | | | | |

Core i5-10500T vs i7-4702MQ


Description
The i5-10500T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i7-4702MQ is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10500T gets a score of 302.1 k points while the i7-4702MQ gets 145.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10500T is 2.1 times faster than the i7-4702MQ . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
306c3
Core
Comet Lake-S
Haswell
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
3.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
Socket G3
Cores/Threads
6/12
4 /8
TDP
35 W
37 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
8192 kB
Date
April 2020
May 2013
Mean monothread perf.
64.6k points
36.8k points
Mean multithread perf.
302.13k points
145.15k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-10500T
i7-4702MQ
Test#1 (Integers)
3.87k
3.45k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
15.79k
8.53k (x0.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.1k
3.99k (x0.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.13k
3.51k (x0.29)
TOTAL
36.89k
19.47k (x0.53)

Multithread

i5-10500T

i7-4702MQ
Test#1 (Integers)
22.17k
11.93k (x0.54)
Test#2 (FP)
101.79k
42.4k (x0.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
34.13k
18k (x0.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.74k
3.6k (x0.96)
TOTAL
161.83k
75.92k (x0.47)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10500T
i7-4702MQ
Test#1 (Integers)
25.16k
18.98k (x0.75)
Test#2 (FP)
22.28k
9.5k (x0.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.18k
4.32k (x0.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.97k
3.99k (x0.33)
TOTAL
64.6k
36.8k (x0.57)

Multithread

i5-10500T

i7-4702MQ
Test#1 (Integers)
144.86k
74.75k (x0.52)
Test#2 (FP)
120.98k
47.72k (x0.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.55k
19.65k (x0.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.73k
3.02k (x0.81)
TOTAL
302.13k
145.15k (x0.48)

Performance/W
i5-10500T
i7-4702MQ
Test#1 (Integers)
4139 points/W
2020 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3457 points/W
1290 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
930 points/W
531 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
107 points/W
82 points/W
TOTAL
8632 points/W
3923 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-10500T
i7-4702MQ
Test#1 (Integers)
6621 points/GHz
5932 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5863 points/GHz
2968 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1364 points/GHz
1351 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3151 points/GHz
1248 points/GHz
TOTAL
16999 points/GHz
11499 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4