| | | | | | |

Core i5-10500 vs i5-1335U


Description
The i5-10500 is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i5-1335U is based on Raptor Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10500 gets a score of 388 k points while the i5-1335U gets 282.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10500 is 1.4 times faster than the i5-1335U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
b06a3
Core
Comet Lake-S
Raptor Lake-U
Architecture
Comet Lake
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
1.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.5 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
BGA 1744
Cores/Threads
6/12
10/12
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
2x32/8x64+2x48/8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
2x1280/2x2048 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
12288 kB
Date
April 2020
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
75.27k points
92.46k points
Mean multithread perf.
387.99k points
282.25k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10500
i5-1335U
Test#1 (Integers)
28.73k
37.94k (x1.32)
Test#2 (FP)
26.01k
26.18k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.08k
13.86k (x2.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.46k
14.48k (x1)
TOTAL
75.27k
92.46k (x1.23)

Multithread

i5-10500

i5-1335U
Test#1 (Integers)
172.66k
125.7k (x0.73)
Test#2 (FP)
167.57k
93.63k (x0.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
39.45k
46.18k (x1.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.31k
16.75k (x2.02)
TOTAL
387.99k
282.25k (x0.73)

Performance/W
i5-10500
i5-1335U
Test#1 (Integers)
2656 points/W
8380 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2578 points/W
6242 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
607 points/W
3079 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
128 points/W
1117 points/W
TOTAL
5969 points/W
18817 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-10500
i5-1335U
Test#1 (Integers)
6384 points/GHz
8248 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5780 points/GHz
5692 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1351 points/GHz
3013 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3212 points/GHz
3147 points/GHz
TOTAL
16727 points/GHz
20100 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4