| | | | | | |

Core i5-10400T vs i5-4570S


Description
The i5-10400T is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i5-4570S is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400T gets a score of 307.2 k points while the i5-4570S gets 138.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 2.2 times faster than the i5-4570S . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
306c3
Core
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
FC-LGA 1200
LGA 1150
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/4
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
6144 kB
Date
April 2020
June 2013
Mean monothread perf.
57.85k points
39.82k points
Mean multithread perf.
307.18k points
138.55k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10400T
i5-4570S
Test#1 (Integers)
22k
20.16k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
19.98k
10.78k (x0.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.57k
4.47k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.31k
4.41k (x0.39)
TOTAL
57.85k
39.82k (x0.69)

Multithread

i5-10400T

i5-4570S
Test#1 (Integers)
136.69k
74.28k (x0.54)
Test#2 (FP)
135.25k
41.76k (x0.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.76k
16k (x0.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.48k
6.51k (x2.63)
TOTAL
307.18k
138.55k (x0.45)

Performance/W
i5-10400T
i5-4570S
Test#1 (Integers)
3905 points/W
1143 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3864 points/W
642 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
936 points/W
246 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
71 points/W
100 points/W
TOTAL
8776 points/W
2132 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-10400T
i5-4570S
Test#1 (Integers)
6111 points/GHz
5600 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5549 points/GHz
2995 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1268 points/GHz
1241 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3141 points/GHz
1226 points/GHz
TOTAL
16069 points/GHz
11061 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4