Core i5-10400F vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE
Description
The i5-10400F is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 4750GE is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400F gets a score of 369 k points while the 4750GE gets 469.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 4750GE is 1.3 times faster than the i5-10400F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400F gets a score of 369 k points while the 4750GE gets 469.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 4750GE is 1.3 times faster than the i5-10400F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0653
860f01
Core
Comet Lake-S
Renoir
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
65 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
2x4096 kB
Date
April 2020
July 2020
Mean monothread perf.
68.02k points
60.99k points
Mean multithread perf.
369.01k points
469.67k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10400F
4750GE
Test#1 (Integers)
26.29k
16.95k (x0.64)
Test#2 (FP)
23.38k
26.26k (x1.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.51k
9.4k (x1.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.84k
8.38k (x0.65)
TOTAL
68.02k
60.99k (x0.9)
Multithread
i5-10400F
4750GE
Test#1 (Integers)
163.37k
159.87k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
159.38k
215.44k (x1.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
38.87k
88.45k (x2.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.39k
5.9k (x0.8)
TOTAL
369.01k
469.67k (x1.27)
Performance/W
i5-10400F
4750GE
Test#1 (Integers)
2513 points/W
4568 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2452 points/W
6155 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
598 points/W
2527 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
114 points/W
169 points/W
TOTAL
5677 points/W
13419 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10400F
4750GE
Test#1 (Integers)
6113 points/GHz
3942 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5437 points/GHz
6107 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1282 points/GHz
2185 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2987 points/GHz
1950 points/GHz
TOTAL
15819 points/GHz
14184 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4