Core i5-10400F vs Ryzen 7 3700X
Description
The i5-10400F is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 3700X is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400F gets a score of 369 k points while the 3700X gets 483.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 3700X is 1.3 times faster than the i5-10400F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400F gets a score of 369 k points while the 3700X gets 483.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 3700X is 1.3 times faster than the i5-10400F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0653
870f10
Core
Comet Lake-S
Matisse
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
32768 kB
Date
April 2020
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
68.02k points
74.35k points
Mean multithread perf.
369.01k points
483.47k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10400F
3700X
Test#1 (Integers)
26.29k
16.77k (x0.64)
Test#2 (FP)
23.38k
26.29k (x1.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.51k
8.79k (x1.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.84k
22.51k (x1.75)
TOTAL
68.02k
74.35k (x1.09)
Multithread
i5-10400F
3700X
Test#1 (Integers)
163.37k
167.94k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
159.38k
209.85k (x1.32)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
38.87k
94.41k (x2.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.39k
11.27k (x1.53)
TOTAL
369.01k
483.47k (x1.31)
Performance/W
i5-10400F
3700X
Test#1 (Integers)
2513 points/W
2584 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2452 points/W
3228 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
598 points/W
1452 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
114 points/W
173 points/W
TOTAL
5677 points/W
7438 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10400F
3700X
Test#1 (Integers)
6113 points/GHz
3811 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5437 points/GHz
5976 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1282 points/GHz
1997 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2987 points/GHz
5115 points/GHz
TOTAL
15819 points/GHz
16898 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4