| | | | | | |

Core i5-10400F vs i5-13400


Description
The i5-10400F is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i5-13400 is based on Raptor Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400F gets a score of 369 k points while the i5-13400 gets 497.8 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-13400 is 1.3 times faster than the i5-10400F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
b06f2
Core
Comet Lake-S
Raptor Lake-S
Architecture
Comet Lake
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
6/12
10/16
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
6x32/4x64+6x48/4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
6x2048+4x4096 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
20480 kB
Date
April 2020
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
68.02k points
100.11k points
Mean multithread perf.
369.01k points
497.83k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10400F
i5-13400
Test#1 (Integers)
26.29k
47.01k (x1.79)
Test#2 (FP)
23.38k
26.73k (x1.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.51k
14.28k (x2.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.84k
12.1k (x0.94)
TOTAL
68.02k
100.11k (x1.47)

Multithread

i5-10400F

i5-13400
Test#1 (Integers)
163.37k
228.2k (x1.4)
Test#2 (FP)
159.38k
160.28k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
38.87k
71.12k (x1.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.39k
38.23k (x5.17)
TOTAL
369.01k
497.83k (x1.35)

Performance/W
i5-10400F
i5-13400
Test#1 (Integers)
2513 points/W
3511 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2452 points/W
2466 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
598 points/W
1094 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
114 points/W
588 points/W
TOTAL
5677 points/W
7659 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-10400F
i5-13400
Test#1 (Integers)
6113 points/GHz
10219 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5437 points/GHz
5811 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1282 points/GHz
3103 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2987 points/GHz
2630 points/GHz
TOTAL
15819 points/GHz
21763 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4