| | | | | | |

Core i5-10400F vs i5-1135G7


Description
The i5-10400F is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i5-1135G7 is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10400F gets a score of 369 k points while the i5-1135G7 gets 238.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10400F is 1.5 times faster than the i5-1135G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a0653
806c1
Core
Comet Lake-S
Tiger Lake UP3
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.9 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 1200
BGA 1449
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
65 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
12288 kB
8192 kB
Date
April 2020
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
68.02k points
68.19k points
Mean multithread perf.
369.01k points
238.87k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-10400F
i5-1135G7
Test#1 (Integers)
4.3k
3.75k (x0.87)
Test#2 (FP)
16.56k
17.28k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.25k
9.5k (x1.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.61k
8.81k (x0.7)
TOTAL
38.72k
39.34k (x1.02)

Multithread

i5-10400F

i5-1135G7
Test#1 (Integers)
18.1k
12.43k (x0.69)
Test#2 (FP)
79.16k
54.95k (x0.69)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
26.75k
26.41k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.81k
7.38k (x0.53)
TOTAL
137.82k
101.16k (x0.73)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10400F
i5-1135G7
Test#1 (Integers)
26.29k
25.96k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
23.38k
23.42k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.51k
10.1k (x1.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.84k
8.71k (x0.68)
TOTAL
68.02k
68.19k (x1)

Multithread

i5-10400F

i5-1135G7
Test#1 (Integers)
163.37k
94.88k (x0.58)
Test#2 (FP)
159.38k
99.81k (x0.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
38.87k
33.6k (x0.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.39k
10.58k (x1.43)
TOTAL
369.01k
238.87k (x0.65)

Performance/W
i5-10400F
i5-1135G7
Test#1 (Integers)
2513 points/W
3389 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2452 points/W
3565 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
598 points/W
1200 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
114 points/W
378 points/W
TOTAL
5677 points/W
8531 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-10400F
i5-1135G7
Test#1 (Integers)
6113 points/GHz
6180 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5437 points/GHz
5576 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1282 points/GHz
2405 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2987 points/GHz
2075 points/GHz
TOTAL
15819 points/GHz
16235 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4