Core i5-1038NG7 vs i5-10400T
Description
The i5-1038NG7 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the i5-10400T is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1038NG7 gets a score of 243.2 k points while the i5-10400T gets 307.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 1.3 times faster than the i5-1038NG7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-1038NG7 gets a score of 243.2 k points while the i5-10400T gets 307.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 1.3 times faster than the i5-1038NG7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
706e5
a0653
Core
Ice Lake-U
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
2 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
FCBGA1344
FC-LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
28 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
12288 kB
Date
May 2020
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
65.35k points
57.85k points
Mean multithread perf.
243.18k points
307.18k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-1038NG7
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
23.2k
22k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
21.2k
19.98k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.4k
4.57k (x0.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.54k
11.31k (x0.98)
TOTAL
65.35k
57.85k (x0.89)
Multithread
i5-1038NG7
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
94.68k
136.69k (x1.44)
Test#2 (FP)
103.38k
135.25k (x1.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
35.79k
32.76k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.33k
2.48k (x0.27)
TOTAL
243.18k
307.18k (x1.26)
Performance/W
i5-1038NG7
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
3381 points/W
3905 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3692 points/W
3864 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1278 points/W
936 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
333 points/W
71 points/W
TOTAL
8685 points/W
8776 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-1038NG7
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
6106 points/GHz
6111 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5580 points/GHz
5549 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2473 points/GHz
1268 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3037 points/GHz
3141 points/GHz
TOTAL
17197 points/GHz
16069 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4