Core i5-10200H vs Xeon Silver 4110
Description
The i5-10200H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 4110 is based on Skylake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10200H gets a score of 260.4 k points while the 4110 gets 281.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 4110 is 1.1 times faster than the i5-10200H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10200H gets a score of 260.4 k points while the 4110 gets 281.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 4110 is 1.1 times faster than the i5-10200H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0652
50654
Core
Comet Lake-H
Skylake-SP
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
LGA3647
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
35 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
11264 kB
Date
September 2020
July 2017
Mean monothread perf.
67.53k points
45.82k points
Mean multithread perf.
260.38k points
281.48k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10200H
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
26.37k
18.78k (x0.71)
Test#2 (FP)
23.91k
16.25k (x0.68)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.57k
3.99k (x0.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.68k
6.8k (x0.58)
TOTAL
67.53k
45.82k (x0.68)
Multithread
i5-10200H
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
114.08k
133.55k (x1.17)
Test#2 (FP)
114.71k
108.43k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.33k
30.02k (x1.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.25k
9.48k (x2.23)
TOTAL
260.38k
281.48k (x1.08)
Performance/W
i5-10200H
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
3259 points/W
1571 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3277 points/W
1276 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
781 points/W
353 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
121 points/W
112 points/W
TOTAL
7439 points/W
3311 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10200H
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
6433 points/GHz
6259 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5831 points/GHz
5417 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1358 points/GHz
1330 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2848 points/GHz
2267 points/GHz
TOTAL
16470 points/GHz
15273 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4