Core i5-10200H vs i5-4200U
Description
The i5-10200H is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i5-4200U is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10200H gets a score of 260.4 k points while the i5-4200U gets 57.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10200H is 4.5 times faster than the i5-4200U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-10200H gets a score of 260.4 k points while the i5-4200U gets 57.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10200H is 4.5 times faster than the i5-4200U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a0652
40651
Core
Comet Lake-H
Haswell
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
2.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1440
BGA1168
Cores/Threads
4/8
2 /4
TDP
35 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
3072 kB
Date
September 2020
June 2013
Mean monothread perf.
67.53k points
28.85k points
Mean multithread perf.
260.38k points
57.84k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-10200H
i5-4200U
Test#1 (Integers)
26.37k
14.74k (x0.56)
Test#2 (FP)
23.91k
7.75k (x0.32)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.57k
3.27k (x0.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.68k
3.09k (x0.26)
TOTAL
67.53k
28.85k (x0.43)
Multithread
i5-10200H
i5-4200U
Test#1 (Integers)
114.08k
27.66k (x0.24)
Test#2 (FP)
114.71k
18.65k (x0.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.33k
7.17k (x0.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.25k
4.36k (x1.03)
TOTAL
260.38k
57.84k (x0.22)
Performance/W
i5-10200H
i5-4200U
Test#1 (Integers)
3259 points/W
1844 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3277 points/W
1243 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
781 points/W
478 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
121 points/W
291 points/W
TOTAL
7439 points/W
3856 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-10200H
i5-4200U
Test#1 (Integers)
6433 points/GHz
5669 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5831 points/GHz
2980 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1358 points/GHz
1260 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2848 points/GHz
1187 points/GHz
TOTAL
16470 points/GHz
11095 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4