| | | | | | |

Core i3-9100T vs Ryzen 5 2600


Description
The i3-9100T is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the 2600 is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-9100T gets a score of 192.9 k points while the 2600 gets 291.5 k points.

Summarizing, the 2600 is 1.5 times faster than the i3-9100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906eb
800f82
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Pinnacle Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/4
6/12
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
June 2019
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
60.16k points
57.13k points
Mean multithread perf.
192.88k points
291.53k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-9100T
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
3.79k
3.41k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
15.65k
15.96k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.59k
4.69k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.78k
17.42k (x2.24)
TOTAL
31.81k
41.47k (x1.3)

Multithread

i3-9100T

2600
Test#1 (Integers)
13.97k
20.88k (x1.49)
Test#2 (FP)
57.83k
110.37k (x1.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.03k
39.25k (x2.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.35k
6.66k (x1.53)
TOTAL
93.18k
177.16k (x1.9)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-9100T
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
24.89k
13.76k (x0.55)
Test#2 (FP)
21.82k
23.03k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.83k
5.12k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.63k
15.23k (x1.77)
TOTAL
60.16k
57.13k (x0.95)

Multithread

i3-9100T

2600
Test#1 (Integers)
89.4k
83.23k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
81.19k
161.06k (x1.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.06k
40.52k (x2.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.24k
6.73k (x1.59)
TOTAL
192.88k
291.53k (x1.51)

Performance/W
i3-9100T
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
2554 points/W
1281 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2320 points/W
2478 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
516 points/W
623 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
121 points/W
103 points/W
TOTAL
5511 points/W
4485 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-9100T
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
6727 points/GHz
3529 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5897 points/GHz
5904 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1304 points/GHz
1313 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2331 points/GHz
3904 points/GHz
TOTAL
16260 points/GHz
14650 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4