Core i3-8130U vs Ryzen 3 3300U
Description
The i3-8130U is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the 3300U is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-8130U gets a score of 88.3 k points while the 3300U gets 139.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 3300U is 1.6 times faster than the i3-8130U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-8130U gets a score of 88.3 k points while the 3300U gets 139.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 3300U is 1.6 times faster than the i3-8130U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ea
810f81
Core
Kaby Lake-R
Picasso
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1356
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
15 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
February 2018
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
47.35k points
40.81k points
Mean multithread perf.
88.35k points
139.56k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-8130U
3300U
Test#1 (Integers)
21.09k
12k (x0.57)
Test#2 (FP)
19.41k
19.55k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.05k
4.43k (x1.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.8k
4.83k (x1.72)
TOTAL
47.35k
40.81k (x0.86)
Multithread
i3-8130U
3300U
Test#1 (Integers)
38.23k
43.64k (x1.14)
Test#2 (FP)
38.89k
73.99k (x1.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.75k
17.03k (x1.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.47k
4.91k (x1.99)
TOTAL
88.35k
139.56k (x1.58)
Performance/W
i3-8130U
3300U
Test#1 (Integers)
2549 points/W
2909 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2593 points/W
4933 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
584 points/W
1135 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
165 points/W
327 points/W
TOTAL
5890 points/W
9304 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-8130U
3300U
Test#1 (Integers)
6204 points/GHz
3430 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5708 points/GHz
5587 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1190 points/GHz
1266 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
823 points/GHz
1379 points/GHz
TOTAL
13925 points/GHz
11661 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4