Core i3-8100 vs Xeon X5675
Description
The i3-8100 is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the X5675 is based on Westmere.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-8100 gets a score of 152.9 k points while the X5675 gets 124.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-8100 is 1.2 times faster than the X5675 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-8100 gets a score of 152.9 k points while the X5675 gets 124.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-8100 is 1.2 times faster than the X5675 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906eb
206c2
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Westmere-EP
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.067 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.467 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
4/4
6 /12
TDP
65 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
12288 kB
Date
October 2017
February 2011
Mean monothread perf.
59.18k points
21.04k points
Mean multithread perf.
200.4k points
124.92k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-8100
X5675
Test#1 (Integers)
13.51k
8.77k (x0.65)
Test#2 (FP)
19.38k
5.82k (x0.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.06k
3.47k (x0.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.87k
2.98k (x0.38)
TOTAL
45.81k
21.04k (x0.46)
Multithread
i3-8100
X5675
Test#1 (Integers)
52.88k
53.23k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
75.92k
39.35k (x0.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
19.52k
27.05k (x1.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.53k
5.28k (x1.17)
TOTAL
152.86k
124.92k (x0.82)
Performance/W
i3-8100
X5675
Test#1 (Integers)
814 points/W
560 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1168 points/W
414 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
300 points/W
285 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
70 points/W
56 points/W
TOTAL
2352 points/W
1315 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-8100
X5675
Test#1 (Integers)
3753 points/GHz
2529 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5383 points/GHz
1679 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1405 points/GHz
1001 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2185 points/GHz
860 points/GHz
TOTAL
12725 points/GHz
6070 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4