| | | | | | |

Core i3-7100U vs i3-7100


Description
Both models i3-7100U and i3-7100 are based on Kaby Lake architecture.

The first Kaby Lake CPU was released in August 2016. It uses a 14 nm process and was the first architecture in breaking the previous tick-tock model. Actually, it is not that different from the preceding Skylake: it has 64kB of L1 cache and 256kB L2 cache per core.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-7100U gets a score of 79.6 k points while the i3-7100 gets 124.8 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-7100 is 1.6 times faster than the i3-7100U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806e9
906e9
Core
Kaby Lake-U
Kaby Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1356
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
15 W
51 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
3072 kB
Date
August 2016
January 2017
Mean monothread perf.
33.38k points
57.86k points
Mean multithread perf.
79.6k points
124.8k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-7100U
i3-7100
Test#1 (Integers)
2.41k
4.01k (x1.67)
Test#2 (FP)
9.77k
16.38k (x1.68)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.13k
5.31k (x1.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.55k
3.98k (x1.12)
TOTAL
18.86k
29.69k (x1.57)

Multithread

i3-7100U

i3-7100
Test#1 (Integers)
5k
8.1k (x1.62)
Test#2 (FP)
21.48k
38.7k (x1.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.39k
12.69k (x1.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.18k
3.76k (x1.18)
TOTAL
37.05k
63.24k (x1.71)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-7100U
i3-7100
Test#1 (Integers)
8.66k
14.04k (x1.62)
Test#2 (FP)
12.31k
20.55k (x1.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.28k
5.41k (x1.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.92k
3.99k (x1.02)
TOTAL
28.16k
43.99k (x1.56)

Multithread

i3-7100U

i3-7100
Test#1 (Integers)
17.87k
30.09k (x1.68)
Test#2 (FP)
28.59k
47.84k (x1.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.68k
13.13k (x1.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.15k
3.52k (x1.12)
TOTAL
57.28k
94.59k (x1.65)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-7100U
i3-7100
Test#1 (Integers)
8.76k
14.41k (x1.64)
Test#2 (FP)
13.49k
22.38k (x1.66)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.21k
5.45k (x1.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.9k
4.96k (x1.27)
TOTAL
29.36k
47.21k (x1.61)

Multithread

i3-7100U

i3-7100
Test#1 (Integers)
18.33k
30.48k (x1.66)
Test#2 (FP)
31.08k
52.08k (x1.68)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.5k
12.97k (x1.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.61k
4.56k (x1.27)
TOTAL
60.52k
100.1k (x1.65)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-7100U
i3-7100
Test#1 (Integers)
13.46k
25.53k (x1.9)
Test#2 (FP)
13.45k
22.98k (x1.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.08k
5.37k (x1.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.4k
3.97k (x1.17)
TOTAL
33.38k
57.86k (x1.73)

Multithread

i3-7100U

i3-7100
Test#1 (Integers)
34.95k
54.73k (x1.57)
Test#2 (FP)
33.53k
53.55k (x1.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
7.74k
12.93k (x1.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.38k
3.6k (x1.06)
TOTAL
79.6k
124.8k (x1.57)

Performance/W
i3-7100U
i3-7100
Test#1 (Integers)
2330 points/W
1073 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2235 points/W
1050 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
516 points/W
254 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
225 points/W
71 points/W
TOTAL
5307 points/W
2447 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-7100U
i3-7100
Test#1 (Integers)
5606 points/GHz
6547 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5606 points/GHz
5893 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1282 points/GHz
1377 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1415 points/GHz
1019 points/GHz
TOTAL
13909 points/GHz
14836 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4