Core i3-7100 vs Xeon W3530
Description
The i3-7100 is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the W3530 is based on Westmere.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-7100 gets a score of 94.6 k points while the W3530 gets 72.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-7100 is 1.3 times faster than the W3530 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-7100 gets a score of 94.6 k points while the W3530 gets 72.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-7100 is 1.3 times faster than the W3530 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906e9
106a5
Core
Kaby Lake-S
Bloomfield
Base frecuency
3.9 GHz
2.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.067 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
2/4
4 /4
TDP
51 W
130 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
64 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
8192 kB
Date
January 2017
March 2010
Mean monothread perf.
57.86k points
18.2k points
Mean multithread perf.
124.8k points
72.77k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-7100
W3530
Test#1 (Integers)
14.04k
7.51k (x0.54)
Test#2 (FP)
20.55k
4.93k (x0.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.41k
3.02k (x0.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.99k
2.74k (x0.68)
TOTAL
43.99k
18.2k (x0.41)
Multithread
i3-7100
W3530
Test#1 (Integers)
30.09k
31.33k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
47.84k
23.11k (x0.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.13k
15.78k (x1.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.52k
2.55k (x0.73)
TOTAL
94.59k
72.77k (x0.77)
Performance/W
i3-7100
W3530
Test#1 (Integers)
590 points/W
241 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
938 points/W
178 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
258 points/W
121 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
69 points/W
20 points/W
TOTAL
1855 points/W
560 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-7100
W3530
Test#1 (Integers)
3601 points/GHz
2450 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5268 points/GHz
1608 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1386 points/GHz
986 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1024 points/GHz
892 points/GHz
TOTAL
11279 points/GHz
5935 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4