Core i3-7100 vs Ryzen 3 2200U
Description
The i3-7100 is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the 2200U is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-7100 gets a score of 124.8 k points while the 2200U gets 71 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-7100 is 1.8 times faster than the 2200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-7100 gets a score of 124.8 k points while the 2200U gets 71 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-7100 is 1.8 times faster than the 2200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906e9
810f10
Core
Kaby Lake-S
Raven Ridge
Base frecuency
3.9 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
51 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x64+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2017
January 2018
Mean monothread perf.
57.86k points
36.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
124.8k points
71.02k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-7100
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
4.01k
2.63k (x0.65)
Test#2 (FP)
16.38k
7.84k (x0.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.31k
3.63k (x0.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.98k
2.93k (x0.74)
TOTAL
29.69k
17.02k (x0.57)
Multithread
i3-7100
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
8.1k
5.77k (x0.71)
Test#2 (FP)
38.7k
24.15k (x0.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.69k
9.28k (x0.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.76k
2.83k (x0.75)
TOTAL
63.24k
42.02k (x0.66)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-7100
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
14.04k
11.67k (x0.83)
Test#2 (FP)
20.55k
14.02k (x0.68)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.41k
4.53k (x0.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.99k
2.93k (x0.73)
TOTAL
43.99k
33.14k (x0.75)
Multithread
i3-7100
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
30.09k
20.49k (x0.68)
Test#2 (FP)
47.84k
31.32k (x0.65)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.13k
9.99k (x0.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.52k
3.03k (x0.86)
TOTAL
94.59k
64.82k (x0.69)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-7100
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
14.41k
11.54k (x0.8)
Test#2 (FP)
22.38k
19.69k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.45k
4.55k (x0.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.96k
3.25k (x0.65)
TOTAL
47.21k
39.03k (x0.83)
Multithread
i3-7100
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
30.48k
19.25k (x0.63)
Test#2 (FP)
52.08k
36.27k (x0.7)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.97k
10.2k (x0.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.56k
3.07k (x0.67)
TOTAL
100.1k
68.8k (x0.69)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-7100
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
25.53k
10.73k (x0.42)
Test#2 (FP)
22.98k
18.15k (x0.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.37k
3.99k (x0.74)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.97k
3.89k (x0.98)
TOTAL
57.86k
36.77k (x0.64)
Multithread
i3-7100
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
54.73k
20.11k (x0.37)
Test#2 (FP)
53.55k
36.87k (x0.69)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.93k
10.74k (x0.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.6k
3.31k (x0.92)
TOTAL
124.8k
71.02k (x0.57)
Performance/W
i3-7100
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
1073 points/W
1340 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1050 points/W
2458 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
254 points/W
716 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
71 points/W
220 points/W
TOTAL
2447 points/W
4735 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-7100
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
6547 points/GHz
3157 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5893 points/GHz
5338 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1377 points/GHz
1175 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1019 points/GHz
1144 points/GHz
TOTAL
14836 points/GHz
10814 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4