Core i3-4170 vs i5-11400T
Description
The i3-4170 is based on Haswell architecture while the i5-11400T is based on Rocket Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-4170 gets a score of 49 k points while the i5-11400T gets 67.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-11400T is 1.4 times faster than the i3-4170. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-4170 gets a score of 49 k points while the i5-11400T gets 67.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-11400T is 1.4 times faster than the i3-4170. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306c3
a0671
Core
Haswell
Rocket Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
1.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
LGA1150
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
2/4
6/12
TDP
54 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
6x32+6x48 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
12288 kB
Date
March 2015
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
44.24k points
31.39k points
Mean multithread perf.
92.71k points
67.1k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-4170
i5-11400T
Test#1 (Integers)
4.24k
3.51k (x0.83)
Test#2 (FP)
10.58k
14.2k (x1.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.87k
7.63k (x1.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.2k
6.06k (x1.44)
TOTAL
23.88k
31.39k (x1.31)
Multithread
i3-4170
i5-11400T
Test#1 (Integers)
7.7k
7.4k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
27.14k
31.37k (x1.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.48k
18.11k (x1.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.68k
10.23k (x3.81)
TOTAL
49k
67.1k (x1.37)
Performance/W
i3-4170
i5-11400T
Test#1 (Integers)
143 points/W
211 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
503 points/W
896 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
213 points/W
518 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
50 points/W
292 points/W
TOTAL
907 points/W
1917 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-4170
i5-11400T
Test#1 (Integers)
1145 points/GHz
948 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2859 points/GHz
3838 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1315 points/GHz
2062 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1135 points/GHz
1637 points/GHz
TOTAL
6455 points/GHz
8485 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4