Core i3-10110U vs i5-10400F
Description
Both models i3-10110U and i5-10400F are based on Comet Lake architecture.
Comet Lake was released in 2019 as a 14nm process-refinement. These models were released as 10th generation CPUs like 10nm Ice Lake. There are model with 2 to 10 cores.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10110U gets a score of 106.6 k points while the i5-10400F gets 369 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400F is 3.5 times faster than the i3-10110U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Comet Lake was released in 2019 as a 14nm process-refinement. These models were released as 10th generation CPUs like 10nm Ice Lake. There are model with 2 to 10 cores.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10110U gets a score of 106.6 k points while the i5-10400F gets 369 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400F is 3.5 times faster than the i3-10110U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ec
a0653
Core
Comet Lake-U
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
2/4
6/12
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
12288 kB
Date
January 2019
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
56.64k points
68.02k points
Mean multithread perf.
106.58k points
369.01k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i3-10110U
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
4.26k
4.3k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
15.48k
16.56k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.94k
5.25k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.31k
12.61k (x2.93)
TOTAL
28.98k
38.72k (x1.34)
Multithread
i3-10110U
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
7.41k
18.1k (x2.44)
Test#2 (FP)
29.18k
79.16k (x2.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.26k
26.75k (x2.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.27k
13.81k (x4.22)
TOTAL
50.13k
137.82k (x2.75)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-10110U
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
24.6k
26.29k (x1.07)
Test#2 (FP)
22.32k
23.38k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.02k
5.51k (x1.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.7k
12.84k (x2.73)
TOTAL
56.64k
68.02k (x1.2)
Multithread
i3-10110U
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
47.98k
163.37k (x3.4)
Test#2 (FP)
44.28k
159.38k (x3.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.33k
38.87k (x3.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.98k
7.39k (x1.86)
TOTAL
106.58k
369.01k (x3.46)
Performance/W
i3-10110U
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
3199 points/W
2513 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2952 points/W
2452 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
689 points/W
598 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
265 points/W
114 points/W
TOTAL
7105 points/W
5677 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-10110U
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
6001 points/GHz
6113 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5444 points/GHz
5437 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1225 points/GHz
1282 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1146 points/GHz
2987 points/GHz
TOTAL
13815 points/GHz
15819 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4