Core i3-10110U vs Celeron N4100
Description
The i3-10110U is based on Comet Lake architecture while the N4100 is based on Goldmont Plus.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10110U gets a score of 80.9 k points while the N4100 gets 40.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-10110U is 2 times faster than the N4100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10110U gets a score of 80.9 k points while the N4100 gets 40.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-10110U is 2 times faster than the N4100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ec
706a1
Core
Comet Lake-U
Gemini Lake
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
1.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
2.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
BGA1090
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
15 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x24 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
4096 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
kB
Date
January 2019
December 2017
Mean monothread perf.
56.64k points
17.21k points
Mean multithread perf.
106.58k points
40.57k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i3-10110U
N4100
Test#1 (Integers)
14.3k
4.72k (x0.33)
Test#2 (FP)
20.09k
6.99k (x0.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.23k
2.69k (x0.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.24k
2.81k (x0.66)
TOTAL
43.87k
17.21k (x0.39)
Multithread
i3-10110U
N4100
Test#1 (Integers)
25.51k
12.54k (x0.49)
Test#2 (FP)
41.33k
17.99k (x0.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.81k
6.71k (x0.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.21k
3.33k (x1.04)
TOTAL
80.85k
40.57k (x0.5)
Performance/W
i3-10110U
N4100
Test#1 (Integers)
1700 points/W
2090 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2755 points/W
2999 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
721 points/W
1118 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
214 points/W
555 points/W
TOTAL
5390 points/W
6762 points/W
Performance/GHz
i3-10110U
N4100
Test#1 (Integers)
3487 points/GHz
1966 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4901 points/GHz
2914 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1277 points/GHz
1122 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1035 points/GHz
1171 points/GHz
TOTAL
10699 points/GHz
7172 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4