| | | | | | |

Core i3-10110U vs Ryzen 7 1700X


Description
The i3-10110U is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 1700X is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i3-10110U gets a score of 106.6 k points while the 1700X gets 372.7 k points.

Summarizing, the 1700X is 3.5 times faster than the i3-10110U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806ec
800f11
Core
Comet Lake-U
Summit Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.1 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.1 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
AM4
Cores/Threads
2/4
8/16
TDP
15 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
8x64+8x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
January 2019
March 2017
Mean monothread perf.
56.64k points
56.76k points
Mean multithread perf.
106.58k points
372.73k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i3-10110U
1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
14.25k
12.5k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
21.55k
22.92k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.16k
5.45k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.26k
14.72k (x3.45)
TOTAL
45.22k
55.59k (x1.23)

Multithread

i3-10110U

1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
26.15k
92.51k (x3.54)
Test#2 (FP)
44.03k
144.76k (x3.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.71k
54.43k (x5.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.28k
22.08k (x6.74)
TOTAL
84.17k
313.78k (x3.73)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i3-10110U
1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
24.6k
13.72k (x0.56)
Test#2 (FP)
22.32k
22.48k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.02k
5.12k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.7k
15.44k (x3.29)
TOTAL
56.64k
56.76k (x1)

Multithread

i3-10110U

1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
47.98k
110.92k (x2.31)
Test#2 (FP)
44.28k
200.56k (x4.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.33k
54.24k (x5.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.98k
7.01k (x1.76)
TOTAL
106.58k
372.73k (x3.5)

Performance/W
i3-10110U
1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
3199 points/W
1168 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2952 points/W
2111 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
689 points/W
571 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
265 points/W
74 points/W
TOTAL
7105 points/W
3923 points/W

Performance/GHz
i3-10110U
1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
6001 points/GHz
3611 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5444 points/GHz
5916 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1225 points/GHz
1348 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1146 points/GHz
4063 points/GHz
TOTAL
13815 points/GHz
14938 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4