Core M-5Y10c vs Xeon E5-2620 v4
Description
Both models M-5Y10c and E5-2620 v4 are based on Broadwell architecture.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the M-5Y10c gets a score of 51 k points while the E5-2620 v4 gets 147.8 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 v4 is 2.9 times faster than the M-5Y10c . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the M-5Y10c gets a score of 51 k points while the E5-2620 v4 gets 147.8 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 v4 is 2.9 times faster than the M-5Y10c . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306d4
406f1
Core
Broadwell-Y
Broadwell-EP
Base frecuency
0.8 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
Socket 2011-3
Cores/Threads
2/4
8/16
TDP
5 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
20480 kB
Date
October 2014
March 2016
Mean monothread perf.
22.93k points
29.39k points
Mean multithread perf.
51k points
237.83k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
M-5Y10c
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
7.22k
6.04k (x0.84)
Test#2 (FP)
9.98k
10.18k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.75k
2.74k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.98k
2.41k (x0.81)
TOTAL
22.93k
21.37k (x0.93)
Multithread
M-5Y10c
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
15.07k
47.51k (x3.15)
Test#2 (FP)
24.8k
75.12k (x3.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.68k
19.72k (x2.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.46k
5.45k (x1.22)
TOTAL
51k
147.8k (x2.9)
Performance/W
M-5Y10c
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
3014 points/W
559 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4960 points/W
884 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1335 points/W
232 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
891 points/W
64 points/W
TOTAL
10200 points/W
1739 points/W
Performance/GHz
M-5Y10c
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
3611 points/GHz
2013 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4990 points/GHz
3393 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1374 points/GHz
915 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1492 points/GHz
802 points/GHz
TOTAL
11467 points/GHz
7123 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4