| | | | | | |

Celeron N5105 vs Core i7-5500U


Description
The N5105 is based on Tremont architecture while the i7-5500U is based on Broadwell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N5105 gets a score of 64.1 k points while the i7-5500U gets 63.7 k points.

Summarizing, the N5105 is 1 times faster than the i7-5500U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906c0
306d4
Core
Jasper Lake
Broadwell-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.9 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1338
BGA 1168
Cores/Threads
4/4
2 /4
TDP
10 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
1536 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
March 2021
March 2015
Mean monothread perf.
27.1k points
40.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
64.09k points
82.89k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N5105
i7-5500U
Test#1 (Integers)
9.83k
10.59k (x1.08)
Test#2 (FP)
9.74k
13.72k (x1.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.65k
4.22k (x1.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.88k
3.64k (x0.94)
TOTAL
27.1k
32.16k (x1.19)

Multithread

N5105

i7-5500U
Test#1 (Integers)
25.04k
20.8k (x0.83)
Test#2 (FP)
24.7k
30.44k (x1.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.29k
9.1k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.06k
3.35k (x0.66)
TOTAL
64.09k
63.69k (x0.99)

Performance/W
N5105
i7-5500U
Test#1 (Integers)
2504 points/W
1387 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2470 points/W
2029 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
929 points/W
607 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
506 points/W
223 points/W
TOTAL
6409 points/W
4246 points/W

Performance/GHz
N5105
i7-5500U
Test#1 (Integers)
3388 points/GHz
3529 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3358 points/GHz
4572 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1259 points/GHz
1408 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1338 points/GHz
1213 points/GHz
TOTAL
9344 points/GHz
10721 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4