Celeron N5095 vs Virtual CPU Version 2.5
Description
The N5095 is based on Tremont architecture while the Version 2.5 is based on -.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N5095 gets a score of 93.3 k points while the Version 2.5 gets 85.7 k points.
Summarizing, the N5095 is 1.1 times faster than the Version 2.5. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N5095 gets a score of 93.3 k points while the Version 2.5 gets 85.7 k points.
Summarizing, the N5095 is 1.1 times faster than the Version 2.5. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906c0
663
Core
Jasper Lake
-
Base frecuency
2 GHz
4.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.9 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
FCBGA 1338
-
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/2
TDP
15 W
- W
Cache L1 (d+i)
kB
- kB
Cache L2
kB
- kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
- kB
Date
April 2021
-
Mean monothread perf.
26.6k points
56.16k points
Mean multithread perf.
93.26k points
85.75k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N5095
Version 2.5
Test#1 (Integers)
10.08k
15.7k (x1.56)
Test#2 (FP)
10.11k
22.8k (x2.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.06k
5.61k (x1.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.36k
12.05k (x5.11)
TOTAL
26.6k
56.16k (x2.11)
Multithread
N5095
Version 2.5
Test#1 (Integers)
36.86k
28.49k (x0.77)
Test#2 (FP)
38.51k
37.67k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.17k
10.09k (x0.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.72k
9.5k (x3.49)
TOTAL
93.26k
85.75k (x0.92)
Performance/W
N5095
Version 2.5
Test#1 (Integers)
2457 points/W