Celeron J4105 vs Pentium G645
Description
The J4105 is based on Goldmont Plus architecture while the G645 is based on Sandy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the J4105 gets a score of 61.5 k points while the G645 gets 35.4 k points.
Summarizing, the J4105 is 1.7 times faster than the G645 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the J4105 gets a score of 61.5 k points while the G645 gets 35.4 k points.
Summarizing, the J4105 is 1.7 times faster than the G645 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
706a1
206a7
Core
Gemini Lake
Sandy Bridge
Base frecuency
1.5 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1090
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/2
TDP
10 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
3072 kB
Date
December 2017
September 2012
Mean monothread perf.
18.22k points
22.24k points
Mean multithread perf.
61.49k points
35.38k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
J4105
G645
Test#1 (Integers)
4.9k
8.66k (x1.77)
Test#2 (FP)
7.26k
6.9k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.75k
3.48k (x1.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.32k
3.2k (x0.96)
TOTAL
18.22k
22.24k (x1.22)
Multithread
J4105
G645
Test#1 (Integers)
18.84k
14.06k (x0.75)
Test#2 (FP)
27.45k
11.82k (x0.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.35k
5.83k (x0.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.85k
3.69k (x0.76)
TOTAL
61.49k
35.38k (x0.58)
Performance/W
J4105
G645
Test#1 (Integers)
1884 points/W
216 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2745 points/W
182 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1035 points/W
90 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
485 points/W
57 points/W
TOTAL
6149 points/W
544 points/W
Performance/GHz
J4105
G645
Test#1 (Integers)
1958 points/GHz
2987 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2902 points/GHz
2380 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1102 points/GHz
1199 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1327 points/GHz
1103 points/GHz
TOTAL
7289 points/GHz
7669 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4