| | | | | | |

Celeron G3900TE vs Pentium E5200 (R0)


Description
The G3900TE is based on Skylake architecture while the E5200 (R0) is based on Core.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G3900TE gets a score of 49.3 k points while the E5200 (R0) gets 24.9 k points.

Summarizing, the G3900TE is 2 times faster than the E5200 (R0). To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
506e3
1067a
Core
Skylake-S
Wolfdale
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2048 kB
Cache L3
2048 kB
0 kB
Date
December 2015
August 2008
Mean monothread perf.
27.33k points
13.08k points
Mean multithread perf.
49.34k points
24.89k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
G3900TE
E5200 (R0)
Test#1 (Integers)
2.36k
2.3k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
9.79k
5.9k (x0.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.08k
2.47k (x0.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.36k
1.21k (x0.36)
TOTAL
18.59k
11.89k (x0.64)

Multithread

G3900TE

E5200 (R0)
Test#1 (Integers)
4.45k
4.63k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
18.16k
10.62k (x0.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.48k
4.95k (x0.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.5k
1.82k (x0.52)
TOTAL
31.59k
22.03k (x0.7)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
G3900TE
E5200 (R0)
Test#1 (Integers)
8.56k
2.87k (x0.33)
Test#2 (FP)
12.25k
6.42k (x0.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.17k
2.58k (x0.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.35k
1.21k (x0.36)
TOTAL
27.33k
13.08k (x0.48)

Multithread

G3900TE

E5200 (R0)
Test#1 (Integers)
16.42k
5.74k (x0.35)
Test#2 (FP)
23.61k
12.78k (x0.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.75k
5.18k (x0.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.55k
1.2k (x0.34)
TOTAL
49.34k
24.89k (x0.5)

Performance/W
G3900TE
E5200 (R0)
Test#1 (Integers)
469 points/W
88 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
675 points/W
197 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
164 points/W
80 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
101 points/W
18 points/W
TOTAL
1410 points/W
383 points/W

Performance/GHz
G3900TE
E5200 (R0)
Test#1 (Integers)
3724 points/GHz
1146 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5326 points/GHz
2568 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1380 points/GHz
1033 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1455 points/GHz
485 points/GHz
TOTAL
11885 points/GHz
5232 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4