| | | | | | |

Celeron G3900TE vs Xeon W3550


Description
The G3900TE is based on Skylake architecture while the W3550 is based on .

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G3900TE gets a score of 49.3 k points while the W3550 gets 73.2 k points.

Summarizing, the W3550 is 1.5 times faster than the G3900TE. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
506e3
106a5
Core
Skylake-S
Bloomfield
Architecture
Skylake
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.066 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.333 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
2/2
4 /4
TDP
35 W
130 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
64 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
2048 kB
8192 kB
Date
December 2015
August 2009
Mean monothread perf.
27.33k points
20.24k points
Mean multithread perf.
49.34k points
73.21k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
G3900TE
W3550
Test#1 (Integers)
2.36k
2.3k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
9.79k
5.21k (x0.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.08k
3.31k (x1.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.36k
3.09k (x0.92)
TOTAL
18.59k
13.92k (x0.75)

Multithread

G3900TE

W3550
Test#1 (Integers)
4.45k
8.75k (x1.97)
Test#2 (FP)
18.16k
19.8k (x1.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.48k
12.38k (x2.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.5k
6.17k (x1.76)
TOTAL
31.59k
47.09k (x1.49)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
G3900TE
W3550
Test#1 (Integers)
8.56k
8.34k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
12.25k
5.56k (x0.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.17k
3.26k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.35k
3.08k (x0.92)
TOTAL
27.33k
20.24k (x0.74)

Multithread

G3900TE

W3550
Test#1 (Integers)
16.42k
32.5k (x1.98)
Test#2 (FP)
23.61k
21.59k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.75k
12.85k (x2.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.55k
6.27k (x1.77)
TOTAL
49.34k
73.21k (x1.48)

Performance/W
G3900TE
W3550
Test#1 (Integers)
469 points/W
250 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
675 points/W
166 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
164 points/W
99 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
101 points/W
48 points/W
TOTAL
1410 points/W
563 points/W

Performance/GHz
G3900TE
W3550
Test#1 (Integers)
3724 points/GHz
2502 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5326 points/GHz
1669 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1380 points/GHz
978 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1455 points/GHz
925 points/GHz
TOTAL
11885 points/GHz
6073 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4