Celeron G1610T vs 3855U
Description
The G1610T is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the 3855U is based on Skylake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G1610T gets a score of 38.6 k points while the 3855U gets 24.6 k points.
Summarizing, the G1610T is 1.6 times faster than the 3855U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the G1610T gets a score of 38.6 k points while the 3855U gets 24.6 k points.
Summarizing, the G1610T is 1.6 times faster than the 3855U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306a9
406e3
Core
Ivy Bridge
Skylake-U
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
1.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
35 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
32+32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
2048 kB
2096 kB
Date
December 2012
December 2015
Mean monothread perf.
20.84k points
19.24k points
Mean multithread perf.
38.59k points
24.56k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
G1610T
3855U
Test#1 (Integers)
2.34k
1.64k (x0.7)
Test#2 (FP)
6.54k
6.72k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3k
2.06k (x0.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.74k
2.4k (x0.88)
TOTAL
14.62k
12.83k (x0.88)
Multithread
G1610T
3855U
Test#1 (Integers)
4.67k
2.2k (x0.47)
Test#2 (FP)
12.66k
9.59k (x0.76)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.95k
2.76k (x0.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.53k
2.27k (x0.9)
TOTAL
25.8k
16.81k (x0.65)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
G1610T
3855U
Test#1 (Integers)
7.87k
5.93k (x0.75)
Test#2 (FP)
7.14k
8.53k (x1.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.04k
2.28k (x0.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.79k
2.5k (x0.9)
TOTAL
20.84k
19.24k (x0.92)
Multithread
G1610T
3855U
Test#1 (Integers)
15.12k
7.87k (x0.52)
Test#2 (FP)
14.05k
11.28k (x0.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.94k
2.91k (x0.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.48k
2.5k (x0.72)
TOTAL
38.59k
24.56k (x0.64)
Performance/W
G1610T
3855U
Test#1 (Integers)
432 points/W
524 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
401 points/W
752 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
170 points/W
194 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
99 points/W
166 points/W
TOTAL
1103 points/W
1637 points/W
Performance/GHz
G1610T
3855U
Test#1 (Integers)
3423 points/GHz
3706 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3102 points/GHz
5333 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1323 points/GHz
1423 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1211 points/GHz
1562 points/GHz
TOTAL
9060 points/GHz
12024 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4