Celeron 4205U vs Xeon E5-2697 v2
Description
The 4205U is based on Whiskey Lake architecture while the E5-2697 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4205U gets a score of 37.6 k points while the E5-2697 v2 gets 617.8 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2697 v2 is 16.4 times faster than the 4205U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 4205U gets a score of 37.6 k points while the E5-2697 v2 gets 617.8 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2697 v2 is 16.4 times faster than the 4205U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ec
306e4
Core
Whiskey Lake-U
Ivy Bridge-EP
Base frecuency
1.8 GHz
2.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
1.8 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
LGA 2011
Cores/Threads
2/2
12 /24
TDP
15 W
130 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
12x256 kB
Cache L3
2048 kB
30720 kB
Date
January 2019
September 2013
Mean monothread perf.
20.61k points
27.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
37.61k points
633.14k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
4205U
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
6.53k
10.64k (x1.63)
Test#2 (FP)
9.46k
9.53k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.28k
4.12k (x1.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.34k
3.62k (x1.55)
TOTAL
20.61k
27.91k (x1.35)
Multithread
4205U
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
12.97k
252.69k (x19.48)
Test#2 (FP)
18.12k
238.68k (x13.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.33k
115.5k (x26.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.18k
10.98k (x5.03)
TOTAL
37.61k
617.84k (x16.43)
Performance/W
4205U
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
865 points/W
1944 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1208 points/W
1836 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
289 points/W
888 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
146 points/W
84 points/W
TOTAL
2507 points/W
4753 points/W
Performance/GHz
4205U
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
3629 points/GHz
3041 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5255 points/GHz
2722 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1269 points/GHz
1178 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1298 points/GHz
1033 points/GHz
TOTAL
11451 points/GHz
7973 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4