| | | | | | |

Xeon E5472 vs Ryzen 3 2200U


Description
The E5472 is based on Core architecture while the 2200U is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5472 gets a score of 48.6 k points while the 2200U gets 64.8 k points.

Summarizing, the 2200U is 1.3 times faster than the E5472. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
10676
810f10
Core
Harpertown
Raven Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
LGA-771
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
80 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x64+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x6144 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
kB
4096 kB
Date
November 2007
January 2018
Mean monothread perf.
16.62k points
36.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
48.62k points
71.02k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E5472
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
2.29k
2.63k (x1.15)
Test#2 (FP)
5.85k
7.84k (x1.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.44k
3.63k (x1.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.81k
2.93k (x0.61)
TOTAL
15.39k
17.02k (x1.11)

Multithread

E5472

2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
9.06k
5.77k (x0.64)
Test#2 (FP)
23.09k
24.15k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.7k
9.28k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.53k
2.83k (x1.12)
TOTAL
44.38k
42.02k (x0.95)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E5472
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
2.88k
11.67k (x4.05)
Test#2 (FP)
6.36k
14.02k (x2.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.55k
4.53k (x1.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.83k
2.93k (x0.61)
TOTAL
16.62k
33.14k (x1.99)

Multithread

E5472

2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
11.19k
20.49k (x1.83)
Test#2 (FP)
24.85k
31.32k (x1.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.04k
9.99k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.54k
3.03k (x1.19)
TOTAL
48.62k
64.82k (x1.33)

Performance/W
E5472
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
140 points/W
1366 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
311 points/W
2088 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
125 points/W
666 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
32 points/W
202 points/W
TOTAL
608 points/W
4322 points/W

Performance/GHz
E5472
2200U
Test#1 (Integers)
961 points/GHz
3433 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2119 points/GHz
4123 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
850 points/GHz
1331 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1610 points/GHz
861 points/GHz
TOTAL
5539 points/GHz
9748 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4