| | | | | | |

Core i9-10940X vs i5-12400F


Description
The i9-10940X is based on Cascade Lake architecture while the i5-12400F is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i9-10940X gets a score of 1088.1 k points while the i5-12400F gets 488 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-10940X is 2.2 times faster than the i5-12400F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
50657
90672
Core
Cascade Lake-X
Alder Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.8 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 2066
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
14/28
6/12
TDP
165 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
14x32+14x32 kB
6x32+6x48 kB
Cache L2
14x1024 kB
6x1280 kB
Cache L3
19712 kB
18432 kB
Date
November 2019
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
72.04k points
87.88k points
Mean multithread perf.
1088.11k points
488.01k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i9-10940X
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
29.75k
38.79k (x1.3)
Test#2 (FP)
27.44k
23.73k (x0.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.81k
11.95k (x2.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.05k
13.41k (x1.48)
TOTAL
72.04k
87.88k (x1.22)

Multithread

i9-10940X

i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
485.37k
203.66k (x0.42)
Test#2 (FP)
472.7k
182.98k (x0.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
113.09k
83.88k (x0.74)
Test#1 (Memory)
16.95k
17.49k (x1.03)
TOTAL
1088.11k
488.01k (x0.45)

Performance/W
i9-10940X
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
2942 points/W
3133 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2865 points/W
2815 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
685 points/W
1290 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
103 points/W
269 points/W
TOTAL
6595 points/W
7508 points/W

Performance/GHz
i9-10940X
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
6197 points/GHz
8815 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5717 points/GHz
5394 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1210 points/GHz
2715 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1885 points/GHz
3048 points/GHz
TOTAL
15009 points/GHz
19972 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4