Engineering Sample 506E8 vs A9 9425
Description
The 506E8 is based on Kaby Lake architecture while the 9425 is based on Excavator.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 506E8 gets a score of 211.6 k points while the 9425 gets 41.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 506E8 is 5.1 times faster than the 9425. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 506E8 gets a score of 211.6 k points while the 9425 gets 41.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 506E8 is 5.1 times faster than the 9425. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
506e8
670f00
Core
Kaby Lake
Stoney Ridge
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA-FP4
Cores/Threads
4/8
2/2
TDP
- W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
96+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
1024 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
0 kB
Date
June 2016
May 2018
Mean monothread perf.
56.39k points
31.31k points
Mean multithread perf.
211.6k points
41.73k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
506E8
9425
Test#1 (Integers)
23.91k
11.23k (x0.47)
Test#2 (FP)
21.03k
14.7k (x0.7)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.05k
3.15k (x0.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.4k
2.24k (x0.35)
TOTAL
56.39k
31.31k (x0.56)
Multithread
506E8
9425
Test#1 (Integers)
95.3k
16.58k (x0.17)
Test#2 (FP)
91.94k
17.84k (x0.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.06k
5.09k (x0.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.3k
2.23k (x0.97)
TOTAL
211.6k
41.73k (x0.2)
Performance/W
506E8
9425
Test#1 (Integers)