| | | | | | |

Core i7-11800H (ES) vs i7-11700


Description
The i7-11800H (ES) is based on Tiger Lake architecture while the i7-11700 is based on Rocket Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-11800H (ES) gets a score of 709.9 k points while the i7-11700 gets 729 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-11700 is 1 times faster than the i7-11800H (ES). To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806d0
a0671
Core
Tiger Lake-H
Rocket Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1787
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
45 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x48 kB
8x32+8x48 kB
Cache L2
8x1280 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
24576 kB
16384 kB
Date
May 2021
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
81.62k points
98.87k points
Mean multithread perf.
709.85k points
728.98k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-11800H (ES)
i7-11700
Test#1 (Integers)
4.4k
5.48k (x1.24)
Test#2 (FP)
20.25k
20.99k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.69k
12.58k (x1.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.66k
21.24k (x1.82)
TOTAL
48.01k
60.28k (x1.26)

Multithread

i7-11800H (ES)

i7-11700
Test#1 (Integers)
38.93k
44.15k (x1.13)
Test#2 (FP)
191.89k
196.6k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
108.8k
102.57k (x0.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.95k
10.64k (x0.71)
TOTAL
354.57k
353.96k (x1)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-11800H (ES)
i7-11700
Test#1 (Integers)
15.22k
18.05k (x1.19)
Test#2 (FP)
25.2k
26.13k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.66k
13.92k (x1.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.66k
21.22k (x1.82)
TOTAL
64.74k
79.32k (x1.23)

Multithread

i7-11800H (ES)

i7-11700
Test#1 (Integers)
155.37k
160.49k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
260.27k
225.25k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
115.37k
113.88k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
20.04k
10.64k (x0.53)
TOTAL
551.04k
510.25k (x0.93)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-11800H (ES)
i7-11700
Test#1 (Integers)
17.25k
18.96k (x1.1)
Test#2 (FP)
25.53k
28.34k (x1.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.56k
13.26k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.4k
20.2k (x1.77)
TOTAL
66.74k
80.76k (x1.21)

Multithread

i7-11800H (ES)

i7-11700
Test#1 (Integers)
144.5k
164.31k (x1.14)
Test#2 (FP)
243.41k
253.96k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
109.02k
115.28k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
16k
10.65k (x0.67)
TOTAL
512.94k
544.2k (x1.06)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-11800H (ES)
i7-11700
Test#1 (Integers)
30.84k
35.12k (x1.14)
Test#2 (FP)
26.38k
29.24k (x1.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.66k
12.56k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.74k
21.95k (x1.87)
TOTAL
81.62k
98.87k (x1.21)

Multithread

i7-11800H (ES)

i7-11700
Test#1 (Integers)
294.86k
304k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
280.92k
304.7k (x1.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
113.9k
109.64k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
20.16k
10.64k (x0.53)
TOTAL
709.85k
728.98k (x1.03)

Performance/W
i7-11800H (ES)
i7-11700
Test#1 (Integers)
6553 points/W
4677 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6243 points/W
4688 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2531 points/W
1687 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
448 points/W
164 points/W
TOTAL
15774 points/W
11215 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-11800H (ES)
i7-11700
Test#1 (Integers)
6705 points/GHz
7168 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5734 points/GHz
5967 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2752 points/GHz
2563 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2552 points/GHz
4479 points/GHz
TOTAL
17744 points/GHz
20177 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4