Ryzen Z1 Extreme vs Ryzen 7 1700X
Description
The Z1 Extreme is based on Zen 4 architecture while the 1700X is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the Z1 Extreme gets a score of 553.4 k points while the 1700X gets 372.7 k points.
Summarizing, the Z1 Extreme is 1.5 times faster than the 1700X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the Z1 Extreme gets a score of 553.4 k points while the 1700X gets 372.7 k points.
Summarizing, the Z1 Extreme is 1.5 times faster than the 1700X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a70f41
800f11
Core
Phoenix
Summit Ridge
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.1 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
BGA
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
30 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x64+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
June 2023
March 2017
Mean monothread perf.
101.73k points
56.76k points
Mean multithread perf.
553.41k points
372.73k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
Z1 Extreme
1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
32.74k
13.72k (x0.42)
Test#2 (FP)
27.35k
22.48k (x0.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.23k
5.12k (x0.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
27.41k
15.44k (x0.56)
TOTAL
101.73k
56.76k (x0.56)
Multithread
Z1 Extreme
1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
236.69k
110.92k (x0.47)
Test#2 (FP)
202.63k
200.56k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
102.8k
54.24k (x0.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.28k
7.01k (x0.62)
TOTAL
553.41k
372.73k (x0.67)
Performance/W
Z1 Extreme
1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
7890 points/W
1168 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6754 points/W
2111 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3427 points/W
571 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
376 points/W
74 points/W
TOTAL
18447 points/W
3923 points/W
Performance/GHz
Z1 Extreme
1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
6419 points/GHz
3611 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5363 points/GHz
5916 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2789 points/GHz
1348 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5375 points/GHz
4063 points/GHz
TOTAL
19946 points/GHz
14938 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4