| | | | | | |

Ryzen Z1 Extreme vs Core i9-13900HX


Description
The Z1 Extreme is based on Zen 4 architecture while the i9-13900HX is based on Raptor Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the Z1 Extreme gets a score of 553.4 k points while the i9-13900HX gets 1160.7 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-13900HX is 2.1 times faster than the Z1 Extreme. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a70f41
b0671
Core
Phoenix
Raptor Lake-HX
Architecture
Zen 4
Zen 4
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.1 GHz
5.4 GHz
Socket
BGA
BGA 1964
Cores/Threads
8/16
24/32
TDP
30 W
55 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
8x2048/4x4096 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
36864 kB
Date
June 2023
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
101.73k points
112.85k points
Mean multithread perf.
553.41k points
1160.72k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
Z1 Extreme
i9-13900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
32.74k
53.69k (x1.64)
Test#2 (FP)
27.35k
28.76k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.23k
14.93k (x1.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
27.41k
15.47k (x0.56)
TOTAL
101.73k
112.85k (x1.11)

Multithread

Z1 Extreme

i9-13900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
236.69k
526.44k (x2.22)
Test#2 (FP)
202.63k
420.48k (x2.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
102.8k
196.13k (x1.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.28k
17.68k (x1.57)
TOTAL
553.41k
1160.72k (x2.1)

Performance/W
Z1 Extreme
i9-13900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
7890 points/W
9572 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6754 points/W
7645 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3427 points/W
3566 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
376 points/W
321 points/W
TOTAL
18447 points/W
21104 points/W

Performance/GHz
Z1 Extreme
i9-13900HX
Test#1 (Integers)
6419 points/GHz
9942 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5363 points/GHz
5326 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2789 points/GHz
2765 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5375 points/GHz
2865 points/GHz
TOTAL
19946 points/GHz
20898 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4