| | | | | | |

Ryzen Z1 Extreme vs Core i7-1165G7


Description
The Z1 Extreme is based on Zen 4 architecture while the i7-1165G7 is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the Z1 Extreme gets a score of 553.4 k points while the i7-1165G7 gets 210.4 k points.

Summarizing, the Z1 Extreme is 2.6 times faster than the i7-1165G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a70f41
806c1
Core
Phoenix
Tiger Lake-UP3
Architecture
Zen 4
Base frecuency
3.3 GHz
2.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.1 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
BGA
BGA 1449
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
30 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
12288 kB
Date
June 2023
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
101.73k points
62.1k points
Mean multithread perf.
553.41k points
210.4k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
Z1 Extreme
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
32.74k
22.97k (x0.7)
Test#2 (FP)
27.35k
21.61k (x0.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.23k
8.99k (x0.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
27.41k
8.52k (x0.31)
TOTAL
101.73k
62.1k (x0.61)

Multithread

Z1 Extreme

i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
236.69k
82.75k (x0.35)
Test#2 (FP)
202.63k
86.58k (x0.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
102.8k
29.34k (x0.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.28k
11.72k (x1.04)
TOTAL
553.41k
210.4k (x0.38)

Performance/W
Z1 Extreme
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
7890 points/W
2955 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
6754 points/W
3092 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3427 points/W
1048 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
376 points/W
419 points/W
TOTAL
18447 points/W
7514 points/W

Performance/GHz
Z1 Extreme
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
6419 points/GHz
4887 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5363 points/GHz
4599 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2789 points/GHz
1912 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5375 points/GHz
1813 points/GHz
TOTAL
19946 points/GHz
13212 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4