Ryzen 9 7940HS vs Xeon E5-2680 v4
Description
The 7940HS is based on Zen 4 architecture while the E5-2680 v4 is based on Broadwell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7940HS gets a score of 718.6 k points while the E5-2680 v4 gets 1162.6 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2680 v4 is 1.6 times faster than the 7940HS. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7940HS gets a score of 718.6 k points while the E5-2680 v4 gets 1162.6 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2680 v4 is 1.6 times faster than the 7940HS. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a70f41
406f1
Core
Phoenix
Broadwell-EP
Base frecuency
4 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.2 GHz
3.3 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP7r2
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
8/16
14/28
TDP
35 W
120 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
14x32+14x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
14x256 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
35840 kB
Date
March 2023
March 2016
Mean monothread perf.
113.57k points
41.35k points
Mean multithread perf.
718.59k points
1162.63k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
7940HS
E5-2680 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
38.25k
17.8k (x0.47)
Test#2 (FP)
29.92k
16.51k (x0.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.5k
4.47k (x0.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
29.89k
2.56k (x0.09)
TOTAL
113.57k
41.35k (x0.36)
Multithread
7940HS
E5-2680 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
309.6k
494.82k (x1.6)
Test#2 (FP)
260.4k
514.13k (x1.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
128.56k
132.87k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
20.04k
20.8k (x1.04)
TOTAL
718.59k
1162.63k (x1.62)
Performance/W
7940HS
E5-2680 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
8846 points/W
4124 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
7440 points/W
4284 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3673 points/W
1107 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
573 points/W
173 points/W
TOTAL
20531 points/W
9689 points/W
Performance/GHz
7940HS
E5-2680 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
7355 points/GHz
5393 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5755 points/GHz
5004 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2981 points/GHz
1355 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5748 points/GHz
777 points/GHz
TOTAL
21839 points/GHz
12529 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4