| | | | | | |

Ryzen 9 7940HS vs Engineering Sample 906ED 2.1GHz


Description
The 7940HS is based on Zen 4 architecture while the 906ED 2.1GHz is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7940HS gets a score of 718.6 k points while the 906ED 2.1GHz gets 657.2 k points.

Summarizing, the 7940HS is 1.1 times faster than the 906ED 2.1GHz. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a70f41
906ed
Core
Phoenix
Comet Lake-H
Architecture
Zen 4
Base frecuency
4 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.2 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP7r2
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
35 W
- W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
16384 kB
Date
March 2023
March 2020
Mean monothread perf.
113.57k points
86.65k points
Mean multithread perf.
718.59k points
657.19k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
7940HS
906ED 2.1GHz
Test#1 (Integers)
38.25k
33.92k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
29.92k
30k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.5k
7.01k (x0.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
29.89k
15.73k (x0.53)
TOTAL
113.57k
86.65k (x0.76)

Multithread

7940HS

906ED 2.1GHz
Test#1 (Integers)
309.6k
302.78k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
260.4k
278.98k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
128.56k
67.89k (x0.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
20.04k
7.53k (x0.38)
TOTAL
718.59k
657.19k (x0.91)

Performance/W
7940HS
906ED 2.1GHz
Test#1 (Integers)
8846 points/W