Ryzen 9 7940HS vs Ryzen Z1 Extreme
Description
Both models 7940HS and Z1 Extreme are based on Zen 4 architecture.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7940HS gets a score of 718.6 k points while the Z1 Extreme gets 553.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 7940HS is 1.3 times faster than the Z1 Extreme. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7940HS gets a score of 718.6 k points while the Z1 Extreme gets 553.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 7940HS is 1.3 times faster than the Z1 Extreme. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a70f41
a70f41
Core
Phoenix
Phoenix
Architecture
Zen 4
Zen 4
Base frecuency
4 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.2 GHz
5.1 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP7r2
BGA
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
35 W
30 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
16384 kB
Date
March 2023
June 2023
Mean monothread perf.
113.57k points
101.73k points
Mean multithread perf.
718.59k points
553.41k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
7940HS
Z1 Extreme
Test#1 (Integers)
38.25k
32.74k (x0.86)
Test#2 (FP)
29.92k
27.35k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.5k
14.23k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
29.89k
27.41k (x0.92)
TOTAL
113.57k
101.73k (x0.9)
Multithread
7940HS
Z1 Extreme
Test#1 (Integers)
309.6k
236.69k (x0.76)
Test#2 (FP)
260.4k
202.63k (x0.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
128.56k
102.8k (x0.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
20.04k
11.28k (x0.56)
TOTAL
718.59k
553.41k (x0.77)
Performance/W
7940HS
Z1 Extreme
Test#1 (Integers)
8846 points/W
7890 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
7440 points/W
6754 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3673 points/W
3427 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
573 points/W
376 points/W
TOTAL
20531 points/W
18447 points/W
Performance/GHz
7940HS
Z1 Extreme
Test#1 (Integers)
7355 points/GHz
6419 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5755 points/GHz
5363 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2981 points/GHz
2789 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5748 points/GHz
5375 points/GHz
TOTAL
21839 points/GHz
19946 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4