Ryzen 9 7940HS vs 5900X
Description
The 7940HS is based on Zen 4 architecture while the 5900X is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7940HS gets a score of 718.6 k points while the 5900X gets 840.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 5900X is 1.2 times faster than the 7940HS. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7940HS gets a score of 718.6 k points while the 5900X gets 840.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 5900X is 1.2 times faster than the 7940HS. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a70f41
a20f10
Core
Phoenix
Vermeer
Base frecuency
4 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.2 GHz
4.8 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP7r2
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/16
12/24
TDP
35 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
12x512 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
2x32768 kB
Date
March 2023
November 2020
Mean monothread perf.
113.57k points
89.82k points
Mean multithread perf.
718.59k points
840.11k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
7940HS
5900X
Test#1 (Integers)
38.25k
24.34k (x0.64)
Test#2 (FP)
29.92k
26.8k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.5k
12.12k (x0.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
29.89k
26.55k (x0.89)
TOTAL
113.57k
89.82k (x0.79)
Multithread
7940HS
5900X
Test#1 (Integers)
309.6k
263.12k (x0.85)
Test#2 (FP)
260.4k
353.9k (x1.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
128.56k
159.07k (x1.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
20.04k
64.01k (x3.19)
TOTAL
718.59k
840.11k (x1.17)
Performance/W
7940HS
5900X
Test#1 (Integers)
8846 points/W
2506 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
7440 points/W
3371 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3673 points/W
1515 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
573 points/W
610 points/W
TOTAL
20531 points/W
8001 points/W
Performance/GHz
7940HS
5900X
Test#1 (Integers)
7355 points/GHz
5071 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5755 points/GHz
5584 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2981 points/GHz
2526 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5748 points/GHz
5530 points/GHz
TOTAL
21839 points/GHz
18712 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4