Ryzen 9 7940HS vs Ryzen 5 1600X
Description
The 7940HS is based on Zen 4 architecture while the 1600X is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7940HS gets a score of 718.6 k points while the 1600X gets 173.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 7940HS is 4.1 times faster than the 1600X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7940HS gets a score of 718.6 k points while the 1600X gets 173.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 7940HS is 4.1 times faster than the 1600X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a70f41
800f11
Core
Phoenix
Summit Ridge
Base frecuency
4 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.2 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP7r2
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
35 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
March 2023
April 2017
Mean monothread perf.
113.57k points
60.09k points
Mean multithread perf.
718.59k points
173.2k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
7940HS
1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
38.25k
14.63k (x0.38)
Test#2 (FP)
29.92k
24.09k (x0.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.5k
5.51k (x0.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
29.89k
15.86k (x0.53)
TOTAL
113.57k
60.09k (x0.53)
Multithread
7940HS
1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
309.6k
48.75k (x0.16)
Test#2 (FP)
260.4k
80.1k (x0.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
128.56k
24.5k (x0.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
20.04k
19.85k (x0.99)
TOTAL
718.59k
173.2k (x0.24)
Performance/W
7940HS
1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
8846 points/W
513 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
7440 points/W
843 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3673 points/W
258 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
573 points/W
209 points/W
TOTAL
20531 points/W
1823 points/W
Performance/GHz
7940HS
1600X
Test#1 (Integers)
7355 points/GHz
3659 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5755 points/GHz
6022 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2981 points/GHz
1378 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5748 points/GHz
3966 points/GHz
TOTAL
21839 points/GHz
15023 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4