| | | | | | |

Ryzen 9 7940HS vs Core i9-13980HX


Description
The 7940HS is based on Zen 4 architecture while the i9-13980HX is based on Raptor Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7940HS gets a score of 718.6 k points while the i9-13980HX gets 1317.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-13980HX is 1.8 times faster than the 7940HS. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a70f41
b0671
Core
Phoenix
Raptor Lake-HX
Architecture
Zen 4
Zen 4
Base frecuency
4 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.2 GHz
5.6 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP7r2
BGA 1964
Cores/Threads
8/16
24/32
TDP
35 W
55 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32/16x64+8x48/16x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
8x2048+16x4096 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
36864 kB
Date
March 2023
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
113.57k points
116.05k points
Mean multithread perf.
718.59k points
1317.53k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
7940HS
i9-13980HX
Test#1 (Integers)
38.25k
54.07k (x1.41)
Test#2 (FP)
29.92k
30.22k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.5k
15.67k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
29.89k
16.09k (x0.54)
TOTAL
113.57k
116.05k (x1.02)

Multithread

7940HS

i9-13980HX
Test#1 (Integers)
309.6k
597.18k (x1.93)
Test#2 (FP)
260.4k
466.55k (x1.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
128.56k
225.13k (x1.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
20.04k
28.67k (x1.43)
TOTAL
718.59k
1317.53k (x1.83)

Performance/W
7940HS
i9-13980HX
Test#1 (Integers)
8846 points/W
10858 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
7440 points/W
8483 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3673 points/W
4093 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
573 points/W
521 points/W
TOTAL
20531 points/W
23955 points/W

Performance/GHz
7940HS
i9-13980HX
Test#1 (Integers)
7355 points/GHz
9655 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5755 points/GHz
5396 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2981 points/GHz
2798 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5748 points/GHz
2874 points/GHz
TOTAL
21839 points/GHz
20723 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4