| | | | | | |

Ryzen 9 7940HS vs Core i7-13700T


Description
The 7940HS is based on Zen 4 architecture while the i7-13700T is based on Raptor Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7940HS gets a score of 718.6 k points while the i7-13700T gets 951.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-13700T is 1.3 times faster than the 7940HS. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a70f41
b0671
Core
Phoenix
Raptor Lake-S
Architecture
Zen 4
Zen 4
Base frecuency
4 GHz
1.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.2 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP7r2
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
8/16
16/24
TDP
35 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32/8x64+8x48/8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
8x2048/2x4096 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
30720 kB
Date
March 2023
January 2023
Mean monothread perf.
113.57k points
107.15k points
Mean multithread perf.
718.59k points
951.3k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
7940HS
i7-13700T
Test#1 (Integers)
38.25k
46.53k (x1.22)
Test#2 (FP)
29.92k
28.48k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.5k
15.08k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
29.89k
17.07k (x0.57)
TOTAL
113.57k
107.15k (x0.94)

Multithread

7940HS

i7-13700T
Test#1 (Integers)
309.6k
443.98k (x1.43)
Test#2 (FP)
260.4k
343.34k (x1.32)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
128.56k
147.61k (x1.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
20.04k
16.36k (x0.82)
TOTAL
718.59k
951.3k (x1.32)

Performance/W
7940HS
i7-13700T
Test#1 (Integers)
8846 points/W
12685 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
7440 points/W
9810 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3673 points/W
4217 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
573 points/W
468 points/W
TOTAL
20531 points/W
27180 points/W

Performance/GHz
7940HS
i7-13700T
Test#1 (Integers)
7355 points/GHz
9496 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5755 points/GHz
5812 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2981 points/GHz
3077 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5748 points/GHz
3483 points/GHz
TOTAL
21839 points/GHz
21868 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4