Ryzen 9 7940HS vs Core i9-12900K
Description
The 7940HS is based on Zen 4 architecture while the i9-12900K is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7940HS gets a score of 718.6 k points while the i9-12900K gets 1131.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-12900K is 1.6 times faster than the 7940HS. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7940HS gets a score of 718.6 k points while the i9-12900K gets 1131.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-12900K is 1.6 times faster than the 7940HS. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a70f41
90672
Core
Phoenix
Alder Lake
Base frecuency
4 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.2 GHz
5.2 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP7r2
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
8/16
16/24
TDP
35 W
241 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32/8x64+8x48/8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
8x1280+8x2048 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
30720 kB
Date
March 2023
November 2021
Mean monothread perf.
113.57k points
109.05k points
Mean multithread perf.
718.59k points
1131.59k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
7940HS
i9-12900K
Test#1 (Integers)
38.25k
47.92k (x1.25)
Test#2 (FP)
29.92k
30.1k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.5k
15.65k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
29.89k
15.38k (x0.51)
TOTAL
113.57k
109.05k (x0.96)
Multithread
7940HS
i9-12900K
Test#1 (Integers)
309.6k
502.11k (x1.62)
Test#2 (FP)
260.4k
414.67k (x1.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
128.56k
192.52k (x1.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
20.04k
22.3k (x1.11)
TOTAL
718.59k
1131.59k (x1.57)
Performance/W
7940HS
i9-12900K
Test#1 (Integers)
8846 points/W
2083 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
7440 points/W
1721 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3673 points/W
799 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
573 points/W
93 points/W
TOTAL
20531 points/W
4695 points/W
Performance/GHz
7940HS
i9-12900K
Test#1 (Integers)
7355 points/GHz
9216 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5755 points/GHz
5789 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2981 points/GHz
3009 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5748 points/GHz
2957 points/GHz
TOTAL
21839 points/GHz
20971 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4