Ryzen 9 7940HS vs Core i5-12400F
Description
The 7940HS is based on Zen 4 architecture while the i5-12400F is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7940HS gets a score of 718.6 k points while the i5-12400F gets 399.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 7940HS is 1.8 times faster than the i5-12400F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7940HS gets a score of 718.6 k points while the i5-12400F gets 399.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 7940HS is 1.8 times faster than the i5-12400F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a70f41
90675
Core
Phoenix
Alder Lake-S
Base frecuency
4 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.2 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP7r2
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
35 W
117 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x32/0x64+6x48/0x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
6x1280+0x2048 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
18432 kB
Date
March 2023
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
113.57k points
76.46k points
Mean multithread perf.
718.59k points
399.39k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
7940HS
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
38.25k
33.85k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
29.92k
20.33k (x0.68)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.5k
10.51k (x0.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
29.89k
11.77k (x0.39)
TOTAL
113.57k
76.46k (x0.67)
Multithread
7940HS
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
309.6k
174.21k (x0.56)
Test#2 (FP)
260.4k
141.31k (x0.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
128.56k
64.86k (x0.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
20.04k
19.01k (x0.95)
TOTAL
718.59k
399.39k (x0.56)
Performance/W
7940HS
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
8846 points/W
1489 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
7440 points/W
1208 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3673 points/W
554 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
573 points/W
162 points/W
TOTAL
20531 points/W
3414 points/W
Performance/GHz
7940HS
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
7355 points/GHz
7693 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5755 points/GHz
4621 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2981 points/GHz
2389 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5748 points/GHz
2675 points/GHz
TOTAL
21839 points/GHz
17378 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4