Ryzen 9 7940HS vs Core i3-1215U
Description
The 7940HS is based on Zen 4 architecture while the i3-1215U is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7940HS gets a score of 718.6 k points while the i3-1215U gets 185.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 7940HS is 3.9 times faster than the i3-1215U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7940HS gets a score of 718.6 k points while the i3-1215U gets 185.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 7940HS is 3.9 times faster than the i3-1215U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a70f41
906a4
Core
Phoenix
Alder Lake-H
Base frecuency
4 GHz
0.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.2 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP7r2
BGA 1744
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/8
TDP
35 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
2x32/4x64+2x48/4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
2x1280+2x2048 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
10240 kB
Date
March 2023
April 2022
Mean monothread perf.
113.57k points
80.34k points
Mean multithread perf.
718.59k points
185.6k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
7940HS
i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
38.25k
37.56k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
29.92k
21.13k (x0.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.5k
11.35k (x0.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
29.89k
10.31k (x0.34)
TOTAL
113.57k
80.34k (x0.71)
Multithread
7940HS
i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
309.6k
73.97k (x0.24)
Test#2 (FP)
260.4k
72.37k (x0.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
128.56k
29.61k (x0.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
20.04k
9.65k (x0.48)
TOTAL
718.59k
185.6k (x0.26)
Performance/W
7940HS
i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
8846 points/W
4931 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
7440 points/W
4825 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3673 points/W
1974 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
573 points/W
643 points/W
TOTAL
20531 points/W
12374 points/W
Performance/GHz
7940HS
i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
7355 points/GHz
8535 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5755 points/GHz
4802 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2981 points/GHz
2579 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5748 points/GHz
2343 points/GHz
TOTAL
21839 points/GHz
18258 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4