Ryzen 9 7940HS vs Core i3-12100F
Description
The 7940HS is based on Zen 4 architecture while the i3-12100F is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7940HS gets a score of 718.6 k points while the i3-12100F gets 340.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 7940HS is 2.1 times faster than the i3-12100F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7940HS gets a score of 718.6 k points while the i3-12100F gets 340.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 7940HS is 2.1 times faster than the i3-12100F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a70f41
90675
Core
Phoenix
Alder Lake-S
Base frecuency
4 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.2 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP7r2
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
35 W
58 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+x4x48 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
12288 kB
Date
March 2023
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
113.57k points
88.81k points
Mean multithread perf.
718.59k points
340.49k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
7940HS
i3-12100F
Test#1 (Integers)
38.25k
39.54k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
29.92k
23.79k (x0.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
15.5k
11.96k (x0.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
29.89k
13.52k (x0.45)
TOTAL
113.57k
88.81k (x0.78)
Multithread
7940HS
i3-12100F
Test#1 (Integers)
309.6k
148k (x0.48)
Test#2 (FP)
260.4k
123.08k (x0.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
128.56k
52.73k (x0.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
20.04k
16.67k (x0.83)
TOTAL
718.59k
340.49k (x0.47)
Performance/W
7940HS
i3-12100F
Test#1 (Integers)
8846 points/W
2552 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
7440 points/W
2122 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3673 points/W
909 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
573 points/W
287 points/W
TOTAL
20531 points/W
5871 points/W
Performance/GHz
7940HS
i3-12100F
Test#1 (Integers)
7355 points/GHz
9195 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5755 points/GHz
5532 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2981 points/GHz
2781 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5748 points/GHz
3144 points/GHz
TOTAL
21839 points/GHz
20652 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4