Ryzen 9 7940HS vs Core i9-9900KF
Description
The 7940HS is based on Zen 4 architecture while the i9-9900KF is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7940HS gets a score of 678.5 k points while the i9-9900KF gets 560.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 7940HS is 1.2 times faster than the i9-9900KF. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 7940HS gets a score of 678.5 k points while the i9-9900KF gets 560.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 7940HS is 1.2 times faster than the i9-9900KF. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
a70f41
906ed
Core
Phoenix
Coffee Lake-S
Base frecuency
4 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
5.2 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP7r2
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
35 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
16386 kB
Date
March 2023
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
107.71k points
84.62k points
Mean multithread perf.
678.46k points
560.37k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
7940HS
i9-9900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
37.07k
33.03k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
29.49k
29.54k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
14.86k
6.56k (x0.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
26.29k
15.49k (x0.59)
TOTAL
107.71k
84.62k (x0.79)
Multithread
7940HS
i9-9900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
286.22k
259.64k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
254.32k
236.58k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
123.23k
53.37k (x0.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.69k
10.78k (x0.73)
TOTAL
678.46k
560.37k (x0.83)
Performance/W
7940HS
i9-9900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
8178 points/W
2733 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
7266 points/W
2490 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3521 points/W
562 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
420 points/W
113 points/W
TOTAL
19385 points/W
5899 points/W
Performance/GHz
7940HS
i9-9900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
7129 points/GHz
6606 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5671 points/GHz
5908 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2858 points/GHz
1313 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5055 points/GHz
3099 points/GHz
TOTAL
20713 points/GHz
16925 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4