| | | | | | |

Ryzen 9 5950X vs Core i7-11700F


Description
The 5950X is based on Zen 3 architecture while the i7-11700F is based on Rocket Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 5950X gets a score of 1060.6 k points while the i7-11700F gets 512.3 k points.

Summarizing, the 5950X is 2.1 times faster than the i7-11700F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
a20f12
a0671
Core
Vermeer
Rocket Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.9 GHz
4.9 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
16/32
8/16
TDP
105 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
16x32+16x32 kB
8x32+8x48 kB
Cache L2
16x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
2x32768 kB
16384 kB
Date
November 2020
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
79.51k points
89.58k points
Mean multithread perf.
1060.62k points
512.32k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
5950X
i7-11700F
Test#1 (Integers)
19.88k
32.55k (x1.64)
Test#2 (FP)
25.26k
26.95k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.77k
10.76k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
23.59k
19.32k (x0.82)
TOTAL
79.51k
89.58k (x1.13)

Multithread

5950X

i7-11700F
Test#1 (Integers)
349.53k
232.06k (x0.66)
Test#2 (FP)
470.67k
203.56k (x0.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
207.28k
72.89k (x0.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
33.13k
3.81k (x0.11)
TOTAL
1060.62k
512.32k (x0.48)

Performance/W
5950X
i7-11700F
Test#1 (Integers)
3329 points/W
3570 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4483 points/W
3132 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1974 points/W
1121 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
316 points/W
59 points/W
TOTAL
10101 points/W
7882 points/W

Performance/GHz
5950X
i7-11700F
Test#1 (Integers)
4058 points/GHz
6642 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5155 points/GHz
5500 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2198 points/GHz
2196 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4815 points/GHz
3943 points/GHz
TOTAL
16226 points/GHz
18281 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4